22 Creedmoor Load Help

User avatar
tripodmvr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21608
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:31 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by tripodmvr »

QL's view on the best propellants to use with your short barrel. Look at fill and burn %. N560 is good and S365 is a better choice.
22 Creed powder choices.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
.22 Krico, Howa 223 Varminter, 243 AI Musgrave RSA, Ruger RPR 243, P14 - 7 x 64, BSA 303 Sporter, 375 H&H Musgrave, 30-06 Ruger No. 1A, Khan O/U 12br, Norinco O/U 12br
User avatar
Heinds
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 2:33 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Heinds »

I would risk a guess that the barrel is not a shooter. A good barrel should be able to show you that it wants to shoot in 20 shots or less when using a powder/bullet combo which should be working. When you run through 100-200 rounds and struggle to get good groups with different bullets something else is wrong.

My 2c
Sako 85 6XC
Howa 22-250 Rem
Blaser R8 6.5x55
Tikka .260AI Rem
Tikka 223
Glock 9MMP
Baretta SP1 O/U
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Thanks for this, much appreciated.
tripodmvr wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 8:00 pm QL's view on the best propellants to use with your short barrel. Look at fill and burn %. N560 is good and S365 is a better choice.

22 Creed powder choices.png
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Maybe time to go back to the gunsmith.
Heinds wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 9:01 pm I would risk a guess that the barrel is not a shooter. A good barrel should be able to show you that it wants to shoot in 20 shots or less when using a powder/bullet combo which should be working. When you run through 100-200 rounds and struggle to get good groups with different bullets something else is wrong.

My 2c
User avatar
Capt. Yoda
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 13507
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:35 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Capt. Yoda »

Heinds wrote: Sun Sep 21, 2025 9:01 pm I would risk a guess that the barrel is not a shooter. A good barrel should be able to show you that it wants to shoot in 20 shots or less when using a powder/bullet combo which should be working. When you run through 100-200 rounds and struggle to get good groups with different bullets something else is wrong.

My 2c
Jip. Na 100 skote moes jy al lankal geweet het of die loop wil skiet
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Ok, so I think we are now close to a workable load,

The below were shot with 85.5gr Bergers, I think the 70, 75, and 80 grainers are not for this fa.

So based on the 2 loads, what do you guys in the know suggest I do now to select the group and refine to get it tighter?

Using Magnun Primers made a significant difference in the consistency and reducing the standard deviation.

Also got a smaller neck bushing today, as I feel the neck when mandrel is a bit "lose".
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
tripodmvr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21608
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:31 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by tripodmvr »

What speeds achieved with the 2 loads?
.22 Krico, Howa 223 Varminter, 243 AI Musgrave RSA, Ruger RPR 243, P14 - 7 x 64, BSA 303 Sporter, 375 H&H Musgrave, 30-06 Ruger No. 1A, Khan O/U 12br, Norinco O/U 12br
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

The speeds as per my Garmin Xero,

- 40.1 grain load, Avg 2,777 and Standard Deviation 7.5
- 39.8 grain load, Avg 2,761 and Standard Deviation 27.6

I would like to push to get some more out of the gun, but know the 18" barrel on a 85.5gr bullet will be a factor.
User avatar
tripodmvr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21608
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:31 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by tripodmvr »

QL calcs give the following. The speed shown is where the nodes are and should be what you want to achieve.

Node 7 40,5gr = 2810fps Your 40,1gr load shows promise.
Node6 1/2 41,8gr = 2910fps
Node 6 42,8gr = 2988fps Pressure calculates at 59K psi (max 62K psi)
if you want to try Node 6 do that judiciously and watch for pressure signs. Gradually ease up to the recommended charge and check the speed. Higher pressure sometimes causes faster burn rates.

Propellant burn rate is from 93 to 96%. N560 is one of the better propellant choices, even if not giving a 100% burn.
.22 Krico, Howa 223 Varminter, 243 AI Musgrave RSA, Ruger RPR 243, P14 - 7 x 64, BSA 303 Sporter, 375 H&H Musgrave, 30-06 Ruger No. 1A, Khan O/U 12br, Norinco O/U 12br
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Thanks a mill, will definitely try, as I would, like to get to 2900fps and with a decent group.

Am I correct in saying faster burn rate will help with the consistency due to the case fill capacity being lower that optimal?
tripodmvr wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 4:16 pm QL calcs give the following. The speed shown is where the nodes are and should be what you want to achieve.

Node 7 40,5gr = 2810fps Your 40,1gr load shows promise.
Node6 1/2 41,8gr = 2910fps
Node 6 42,8gr = 2988fps Pressure calculates at 59K psi (max 62K psi)
if you want to try Node 6 do that judiciously and watch for pressure signs. Gradually ease up to the recommended charge and check the speed. Higher pressure sometimes causes faster burn rates.

Propellant burn rate is from 93 to 96%. N560 is one of the better propellant choices, even if not giving a 100% burn.
User avatar
tripodmvr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21608
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:31 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by tripodmvr »

You are not going to get speed with a faster burning propellant. Pressure might just be too high. Look at the QL suggestions below. N560 is way up for performance. You have already seen the better groups.
22Creed Propellants.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
.22 Krico, Howa 223 Varminter, 243 AI Musgrave RSA, Ruger RPR 243, P14 - 7 x 64, BSA 303 Sporter, 375 H&H Musgrave, 30-06 Ruger No. 1A, Khan O/U 12br, Norinco O/U 12br
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Thanks a mill, much appreciated.
tripodmvr wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 7:47 pm You are not going to get speed with a faster burning propellant. Pressure might just be too high. Look at the QL suggestions below. N560 is way up for performance. You have already seen the better groups.

22Creed Propellants.png
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Ok so this was today's last test based on the recommendations, sticking with the N560 and 85.5gr Bergers.

I think mentally I am now shooting 2 or 3 shots and then f*&^e it up due to the anxiety of wanting this gun to shoot well.

Based on the below, which group do you recommend I now stick with and do I tweak, and how, to try and get it tighter?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
tripodmvr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21608
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:31 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by tripodmvr »

Try 41.6gr as 41.4 and 41.8gr both gave reasonable groups. The only other suggestion I have is that you ask another proficient shooter to shoot a group. This will hopefully give clarity as to your role in the exercise. If that does not show promise I would have the rifle checked over and especially the crown area.
.22 Krico, Howa 223 Varminter, 243 AI Musgrave RSA, Ruger RPR 243, P14 - 7 x 64, BSA 303 Sporter, 375 H&H Musgrave, 30-06 Ruger No. 1A, Khan O/U 12br, Norinco O/U 12br
User avatar
Capt. Yoda
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 13507
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:35 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Capt. Yoda »

What brass are you using?
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Thanks will give that a try.....

Will need to find a proficient shooter, as I am new in the rifle shooting, been sport shooting my whole life, so dont know proficient long gun shooters, unless I hijack someone at a range
tripodmvr wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 5:45 pm Try 41.6gr as 41.4 and 41.8gr both gave reasonable groups. The only other suggestion I have is that you ask another proficient shooter to shoot a group. This will hopefully give clarity as to your role in the exercise. If that does not show promise I would have the rifle checked over and especially the crown area.
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

I use 22 Creedmoor SRP Peterson brass with CCI Magnum primers.
Capt. Yoda wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 7:14 pm What brass are you using?
User avatar
Capt. Yoda
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 13507
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:35 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Capt. Yoda »

Ok that sounds fine, what does your setup look like that you shoot from?
Bipod, Sandbags or a machined rest?
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
User avatar
Alberts
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 123
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Alberts »

I Would try between 40,1 and 40,5.. As Tri pod mentioned earlier. The 40.1 showed promise, and the 40,5 as per QL for me is the best of the last loads.. I assume this is 100m groups..?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Capt. Yoda
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 13507
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:35 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Capt. Yoda »

What is the difference when you measured the neck OD on a fired piece of brass vs a sized piece of brass?
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Bipod front, MDT GRND and then rear bag,
Capt. Yoda wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 8:00 am Ok that sounds fine, what does your setup look like that you shoot from?
Bipod, Sandbags or a machined rest?
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

Correct these are 100m groups.
Alberts wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 11:15 am I Would try between 40,1 and 40,5.. As Tri pod mentioned earlier. The 40.1 showed promise, and the 40,5 as per QL for me is the best of the last loads.. I assume this is 100m groups..?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BunduRic
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2025 5:19 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by BunduRic »

I have not check that, will do that.... What would that show or tell me?
Capt. Yoda wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 12:05 pm What is the difference when you measured the neck OD on a fired piece of brass vs a sized piece of brass?
User avatar
Capt. Yoda
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 13507
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:35 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Capt. Yoda »

It might show that you have a tight chamber and to tight a fit between chamber and the necks
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Malan123
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 2126
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2016 4:07 pm

Re: 22 Creedmoor Load Help

Post by Malan123 »

Just to add my 2cents here, try the 40.5gr load without the bipod on a normal xbag.

Do you have a silencer on the rifle?
Post Reply